h/t James Delingpole – Britain’s Labour Opposition Social gathering, which has an actual likelihood of profitable the following UK election, is severely contemplating a suppose tank proposal to radically minimize working hours and wages to scale back everybody’s carbon footprint.
Plan for 10-hour working week with 75% paycut underneath Labour
Martine Berg Olsen Monday 10 Jun 2019 7:54 am
The Labour Social gathering is discussing plans to herald a 10-hour working week and slash pay by 75 per cent to sort out local weather change. The novel report titled The Ecological Limits of Work by the Autonomy Group states until present carbon emissions are minimize there could be an ‘unprecedented lower within the financial exercise’.
It says the sustainable work week would doubtless be ‘effectively under 10 hours per week’.
Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, who has beforehand backed a four-day working week, mentioned: ‘It is a important contribution to the rising debate round free time and lowering the working week.’ Leo Murray, adviser to Shadow Treasury minister Clive Lewis, mentioned: ‘I like this take quite a bit.’
Lewis has beforehand backed one other controversial report from the group on lowering the working week.
The total report, “The Ecological Limits of Work”, is accessible right here.
Underneath the subject “different issues”, the report authors specific concern that their proposed minimize won’t be deep sufficient, as a result of folks working shorter hours is likely to be extra productive in the course of the time they do work, which might cancel a few of the ecological “profit” of a shorter working week.
This isn’t a fringe proposal. Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, who praised the proposal, is a senior determine within the Labour Social gathering, and has an actual likelihood of being put in control of Britain’s banking system and economic system after the following election.
The report type of skips over points which could concern some staff, like how British staff already struggling gasoline poverty are purported to heat their properties and feed their households with 75% much less cash, and the way they’re purported to pay their mortgages and payments (perhaps all mortgages might be forgiven?), however I doubt the politicians contemplating this radical coverage proposal have ever personally skilled actual starvation, poverty or chilly.